Back   StoryCon
Font
PageWidth
Original Content at
https://www.storycon.org/articles/HOPKINS-THE-SELF-AND-GOD-by-Thomas-Farrell-Catholic_Depression_Depression_Faith-150816-466.html

August 16, 2015

HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD is Ong's Crowning Achievement (Review Essay)

By William Smith

The short but densely packed book HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD (1986) is Walter J. Ong's crowning achievement. A Kindle version of it is now available at Amazon.com. So I'd like to take the occasional to write about it. The poetry of the Victorian Jesuit poet Gerard Manley Hopkins (1844-1889) is not everybody's cup of tea. But for those who are interested in his poetry and life, Ong's book repays careful study.

::::::::

Originally Published on OpEdNews

From flickr.com/photos/76635305@N03/7261067230/: Gerard_Manley_Hopkins_by_Thomas_C._Bayfield - detail-contrast
Copyrighted Image? DMCA

Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) August 16, 2015: I greatly admire Walter J. Ong's densely packed short book HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD (1986), the expanded published version of Ong's 1981 Alexander Lectures at the University of Toronto. In many ways this book is the crowning achievement of Ong's scholarly life.

Recently a Kindle version of it has become available at Amazon.com. As a result, I thought I'd call it to the attention of progressives and liberals who might be interested in it. I understand that the poetry of the Victorian Jesuit poet Gerard Manley Hopkins (1844-1889) may not interest everybody. So the book HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD by the American Jesuit cultural historian and theorist Walter J. Ong (1912-2003) may not interest everybody.

Nevertheless, everybody who has ever suffered near-despair and deep depression might be interested in Hopkins' sonnets about his own experiences of near-despair and deep depression -- and in Ong's discussion of those sonnets.

After all, those progressives and liberals who have not yet experienced near-despair and deep depression may get to have that kind of experience if the Republicans sweep to electoral victories in 2016, eh?

So just in case they do, progressives and liberals might want to know that Hopkins' sonnets expressing extreme anguish are available as resources to read. You see, Hopkins practiced the psychological mantra to feel the feelings, and then he articulated his feelings in those sonnets about his own "dark" experiences of desolation and near-despair. (At other times, he also wrote some upbeat poems.)

Of course both Hopkins and Ong were orthodox Roman Catholic priests. To this day Ong is the only Roman Catholic priest who served as president of the Modern Language Association of America (in 1978). Like Hopkins, Ong had studied Greek and Latin. Both men studied philosophy and theology as part of their Jesuit training.

Disclosure: I myself do not agree with Ong's and Hopkins' orthodox Roman Catholic religious convictions. For example, Ong says, "Jesus acts somewhat as the go'el in ancient Hebrew culture, the reliable and resourceful kinsman whose obligation it was to take responsibility on himself for suffering and helpless relatives, to redeem them from slavery, rescue them from starvation, or otherwise extricate them from disaster. Sin, estrangement from God, brought the greatest disaster of all, and Jesus took sin and its consequences on himself in his life, and especially through his passion and death. He became a human being, kinsman to all of us, to serve as go'el, the responsible one, the one who shoulders the burden of estrangement that his kinsfolk cannot carry" (page 114). No doubt Ong's point here is consistent with the interpretation of the historical Jesus' crucifixion and death that his grieving followers constructed. But the historical Jesus was simply crucified on trumped-up charges. He did not die for the sins of the world. Concerning his crucifixion, see Paula Fredriksen's book JESUS OF NAZARETH: KING OF THE JEWS (1999).

Now, as part of Ong's Jesuit training, he did graduate studies in philosophy and English at Saint Louis University, the Jesuit university in St. Louis, Missouri -- where T. S. Eliot (1888-1965) was born and raised.

Ironically, the young Canadian layman Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980), who was teaching English at SLU (from 1937 to 1944), introduced Ong and other students to Hopkins' poetry. Hopkins' poetry was posthumously published in 1918. McLuhan had done graduate studies in English at Cambridge University, where studied under F. R. Leavis (1895-1978) and I. A. Richards (1893-1979) -- both of whom admired Hopkins' poetry. Leavis discusses Hopkins' poetry in his book NEW BEARINGS IN ENGLISH POETRY (1932). Richards discusses Hopkins' poetry in his book PRACTICAL CRITICISM (1929) and elsewhere.

McLuhan served as the director of Ong's Master's 1941 thesis on Hopkins' sprung rhythm. Ong's Master's thesis, slightly revised, was first published in 1949. It is reprinted in the 600-page anthology titled AN ONG READER: CHALLENGES FOR FURTHER INQUIRY (2002, pages 111-174). However, for a more up-to-date scholarly discussion of Hopkins' sprung rhythm, see James I. Wimsatt's HOPKINS'S POETICS OF SPEECH SOUND: SPRUNG RHYTHM, LETTERING, INSCAPE (2006).

McLuhan completed his Cambridge University doctoral dissertation in English in 1943. On the occasion of the centennial of Hopkins' birth in 1844, McLuhan published "The Analogical Mirrors" in the KENYON REVIEW (1944).

In the NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW dated September 3, 1944 (pages 7, 14), McLuhan also published a review of Eleanor Ruggles' book GERARD MANLEY HOPKINS: A LIFE. For a more recent life of Hopkins, see Paul Mariani's GERARD MANLEY HOPKINS: A LIFE (2008). Mariani is a seasoned Hopkins scholar. In Ong's 1986 book about Hopkins, he frequently cites an earlier work by Mariani.

Both McLuhan's "The Analogical Mirrors" and selections from Ong's published Master's thesis on Hopkins' sprung rhythm are reprinted in HOPKINS: A COLLECTION OF CRITICAL ESSAYS, edited by Geoffrey H. Hartman (1966, pages 80-88 and 151-159 respectively).

McLuhan's "The Analogical Mirrors" is also reprinted in collection titled THE INTERIOR LANDSCAPE: THE LITERARY CRITICISM OF MARSHALL MCLUHAN 1943-1962, selected, compiled, and edited by Eugene McNamara (1969, pages 63-73).

Ong published a lengthy review essay about that book and McLuhan's years at SLU in CRITICISM: A QUARTERLY FOR LITERATURE AND THE ARTS (1970). Ong's review essay is reprinted in AN ONG READER: CHALLENGES FOR FURTHER INQUIRY (2002, pages 69-77).

Over his long and productive scholarly life, Ong maintained his interest in Hopkins by occasionally publishing reviews of books about Hopkins and occasionally discussing Hopkins in his own articles. For example, in "Evolution, Myth, and Poetic Vision" in the journal COMPARATIVE LITERATURE STUDIES (1966), Ong discusses Hopkins' poetry extensively. Ong reprinted it in his book IN THE HUMAN GRAIN: FURTHER EXPLORATIONS OF CONTEMPORARY CULTURE (1967, pages 99-126). However, Ong does not mention "Evolution, Myth, and Poetic Vision" in HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD (1986).

Ong's laser-like focus of certain issues in HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD leads him not to mention certain other of his own scholarly publications -- for example, his publications about Milton.

Because Hopkins' poetry was not published until 1918, it was often considered to be part of the literary movement known as modernism. T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound (1885-1972) were other poets in that literary movement. As a result of that misclassification of Hopkins' poetry, later literary scholars have labored diligently to show that Hopkins should be considered to be a Victorian. In his book HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD, Ong accepts that later literary scholarship and also makes his own contributions to why Hopkins should be considered to be a Victorian.

Ong liked to say that we need both closeness (proximity) and distance to understand something. In HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD (1986), Ong claims that "the technologies of writing, print, and computers" are distancing and objectivizing. He also claims that the "inward turn of consciousness develops in counterbalance with the outward turning implemented by the distancing or 'objectivizing of [those technologies]" (page 130).

Now, Hopkins wrote certain sonnets expressing extremely anguishing experiences. Ong suggests that Hopkins wrote those poems "in part to distance the experience out of which they grew" (page 135). Ong further suggests that writing those poems expressing his extreme anguish may have helped "Hopkins manage the experience better" (page 135).

For Hopkins, I would say that writing those poems about his extreme anguish also involved a kind of self-giving -- a giving of his experiences of extreme anguish to others who might read those poems. Citing Mariani, Ong notes that "such self-giving calls for strong ego-structures" (page 39).

In HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD (1986), Ong discusses energy-center imagery in Hopkins' and other Victorians' writings (pages 17-18, 110-112, and 129).

Even though I do not agree with all of Ong's religious convictions, I stand in awe of his own energy as manifested not only in this book but in his entire body of scholarly work.

After HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD was published, Ong published "Technological Development and Writer-Subject-Reader Immediacies" in the book ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: HISTORICAL APPROACHES, edited by Richard Leo Enos (1990, pages 206-215). Ong's essay is centered on Hopkins and his use of newspaper reports that had been telegraphed in to the newspaper. It is reprinted in AN ONG READER: CHALLENGES FOR FURTHER INQUIRY (2002, pages 497-504). That essay continues and further develops Ong's discussion of electric telegraphy and Hopkins' poetry in HOPKINS, THE SELF, AND GOD (1986, pages 48-52).

For a well-researched recent study of Hopkins, see Dennis Sobolev's book THE SPLIT WORLD OF GERARD MANLEY HOPKINS: AN ESSAY IN SEMIOTIC PHENOMENOLOGY (2011).

In his own way, Ong explores semiotic phenomenology in his own work (he repeatedly says that his work is concerned about noetic developments), perhaps most notably in his essay "Voice as Summons for Belief: Literature, Faith, and the Divided Self" in the journal THOUGHT A REVIEW OF CULTURE AND IDEA (1958). Ong's 1958 essay is reprinted in AN ONG READER: CHALLENGES FOR FURTHER INQUIRY (2002, pages 259-275).

For a bibliography of Ong's 400 or so publications, see the late Thomas M. Walsh's bibliography of Ong's publications, including information about reprintings and translations in the book LANGUAGE, CULTURE, AND IDENTITY: THE LEGACY OF WALTER J. ONG, S.J., edited by Sara van den Berg and Walsh (2011, pages 185-245).



Authors Bio:
"The E-Liquid Boxes are the smoking hot product of All packaging industry's . The packaging industry knows the name of The Cosmetic Boxes as the leading company in the United States of America! People who do business use these boxes for the packaging of their e-liquid and people love to get the ┬Če-liquid in the attractive packaging as people love to buy things which look good by its packaging! It is the best time to get the boxes as people are more interested to buy these boxes and want to make their lives more joyful and full of fun! Everybody loves e-liquid so it is important for you to give them different to choose your product on the first hand. We delivered the order within 3 to 5 working days.






"

Back