Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 33 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 35 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (68 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites   No comments

Douglas Rushkoff-- Present Shock and Presentism: Interview Transcript

By       (Page 14 of 16 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     Permalink

 Add to My Group(s)

Rate It | View Ratings H4'ed 1/4/16
Author 87

Rob Kall: We've got two or three minutes left. You're last chapter is Apocalypto, and you talk about Preppers and Zombies. Preppers are fascinating. I've been telling my audience recently you've got to watch at least one show - there are TV channels on it now. What's your explanation of the psychology behind Preppers?

Douglas Rushkoff: It's sort of the same thing with this aching for conclusion. Preppers would rather that the world end than that it keep on going! You know, (laughs) it's so much simpler, it's just - a zombie apocalypse is easier to imagine than next year, right? Who knows what's going to happen in the next election. Displayed over Facebook feeds, its gonna - God knows what it's gonna do.

Where the Prepper reality, everything is in it's place, you're in a nice little RV, you know? You can just sit on that hilltop, and have a shotgun, and shoot zombies, who are relatively slow moving. You don't have to answer the cellphone. You don't have to make money. It's just a conclusion. At least all the frenzy goes away, and you get the simplicity that so many people are longing for. And what I'm arguing is we can get that without the zombie apocalypse, we can get that without destroying the world. We can actually /

Rob Kall: (interjecting) Without the singularity.

Douglas Rushkoff: Yeah.

Rob Kall: So I'm going to wrap up with one last question. A few weeks ago I interviewed a Russian dot-com multimillionaire who was investing a fortune in bringing together leading scientists from around the world including Ray Kurweil and Robert Thurman (who's not a scientist, he's a Buddhist monk). But his goal is to develop by the year 2045 a collection of technologies that will enable people to download their being, their consciousness, into a substrate that can be repaired easily and last forever. And my question is, by 2045, will what it is to be human, what it is to be that being of ourselves be very different from who we are now? And will the technology have an effect on what ends up getting downloaded there, if they can do it? (Which they really think they can.)

Douglas Rushkoff: They can't do it, they're crazy.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16


Rate It | View Ratings

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How To Create An Evil Character-- Sound Familiar? (2586 views)

Transcript: Arlene Goldbard, author, The Culture of Possibility: Art, Artists & The Future (1885 views)

Mallary Jean Tenore-- Writing With Hope-- Restorative Narratives (1859 views)

Writing Stories to Change the World (1820 views)

Archetypal, Mythic Strong Women and Patriarchy -- A Conversation with Jean Shinoda Bolen, MD-- Transcript (1790 views)

As Writing and the Gutenberg Press Changed the World, Are Apps Creating an App Generation? Howard Gardner & Katie Davis (1647 views)

Total Views: 11587